Saturday, December 5, 2015

Trump 'doesn't care a whit for limited government,' writes NYT columnist

Columnists from the New York Times and Washington Post recently commented on accusations that Donald Trump is some kind of "fascist."

Ross Douthat of the New York Times does not specifically argue that Trump is not a fascist, but did state that Trump "isn't really an ideological conservative."

Trump "clearly doesn’t care a whit for limited government or libertarianism, and he’s delighted with a hyperactive state so long as it’s working hand-in-glove with corporate interests," Douthat wrote in a New York Times column picked up by the National Post.

Douthat stated that the "absence of a real American fascism" can be explained in part by some elements in the "American conservative tradition," including: "libertarian skepticism of state power, a stress on localism and states’ rights, a religious and particularly Protestant emphasis on the conscience of an individual over the power of the collective ..."

In a separate column in the Washington Post, titled Why you should stop calling Donald Trump a fascist, Max Ehrenfreund also addresses arguments that equate some of Trump's ideas to fascism.

"The key aspects of fascism are at odds with Trump's persona and his message," Ehrenfreund wrote. "For all his bluster, a President Trump wouldn't pursue the authoritarian, collectivist agenda that characterized Germany's Nazi Party and Italy's Benito Mussolini, at least not according to what he's said so far about his political views."

Saturday, November 22, 2014

Canada should use biometrics to verify identity of voters



680 News in Toronto is reporting that a former member of a Conservative Party of Canada riding association admits he requested a ballot at a voting station after already voting in a different riding.

You would think that at some point, we could have fingerprint readers at voting stations, and no one would have to show ID or voter card or anything. You'd just have to show ID once in order to register for vote, and they would take your fingerprint. Then any time after that, you would just register to vote by showing up to a voter registration office and tapping your finger on to a reader. Any time a person tries to vote twice, or identify themselves as somebody else, it could generate an alert to polling staff, before the person gets the ballot. How much would that cost? Fingerprint readers are being advertised for $15 to $30, so let' say the government could buy in bulk for $20 or less each, for 60,000 polling stations in Canada, that's about $1.2 million for hardware that could be used nationwide in every election.